Want to hear something really scary?
He meant to say we can win the war on terror. Honest. It's all part of our "catastrophic victory" campaign.
So, here's what was scaring me this morning after watching Shrub blather to Matt Lauer. Iraq is getting pitched like this by the GOP talking heads for the R.N.C. this week:
"So what if there was no WMDs? The world is a better place with Saddam in jail. "
And if that was the total context, I'd have to agree. In jail, or out? Better he be in.
However, if the question was asked in context, like so:
Are we in a better place with Saddam in jail, even though
1) we had to declare war on a nation that was not a threat to us at the time, was not engaged in aggression towards us, and was not at war with our allies?
2) we moved to a policy of pre-emptive attack against those we unilaterally designate as enemies?
and 3) we have waged unprovoked war upon a sovereign nation (admittedly, one led by a bad guy), creating an impression that no one in the muslim world will soon forget about the lengths to which we will go to "ensure our safety"?
Well, then, maybe not, if we had to go get him like that.
And after I voiced this opinion (having not had an unexpressed opinion since I was about 4 years old), Spouse of Malcontent said this:
"I think the scary part is that much of the world is probably looking to see if we will kick out this guy in November. Because that is what American democracy means to much of the world: that we can remove an aggressive, militaristic, power-hungry ruler without riots and civil war.
If he goes, the world can see that we don't support his actions and that our democracy is working. If he wins the election--what does that say about our support for his policies? And if he 'wins' like last time...what does that say about our democracy?"
Yep, good call by SoM. That's much more scary.